[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
:: Volume 19, Issue 4 (7-2014) ::
3 2014, 19(4): 299-304 Back to browse issues page
Comparison of Subjective Refraction, Predicted Phoropter Refraction (PPR) by Zywave Aberrometer, and Final Surgical Plan Used for Laser Vision Correction
F Karimian MD , C Shahabi, MR Asadollahi MD, M Tabatabaie PhD, M Aghazadeh Amiri PhD, S Eslami BSc
Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Abstract:   (16004 Views)

Purpose: To study the validity and reliability of subjective refraction, predicted phoropter refraction (PPR) measured by Zywave aberrometer, and final surgical plan applied for laser vision correction.

Methods: This prospective study was conducted on 94 myopic or myopic astigmatic eyes (48 patients) who were candidates for refractive surgery in Negah Eye Hospital from April 2012 to July 2012. Subjective refraction and PPR by Zywave aberrometry were measured and complete ophthalmic examination were performed in all participants. Surgical correction of refractive error was then planned, based on the subjective refraction and the patient’s age. The patient underwent customized surface ablation using the Bausch & Lomb 217 z excimer machine. At 6 months postoperatively, subjective refraction was measured to determine residual refraction. The “exact refraction” was defined as the refraction used for surgery added by postoperative residual refraction. This “exact” amount was compared with the preoperative subjective refraction, PPR and surgical plan.

Results: The mean difference between “exact” myopia and subjective refraction, PPR, and surgical plan were 0.11±0.51D (P=0.03), 0.18±0.70D (P=0.01), and -0.06±0.46D (P=0.01), respectively. The difference between “exact” myopia and myopia in subjective refraction and PPR was significant.

The mean difference between “exact” astigmatism and astigmatism in subjective refraction, PPR and surgical plan were statistically significant (P<0.05). The lowest difference was between “exact” astigmatism and PPR astigmatism. (P=0.021). The correlation coefficient between “exact” myopia and subjective, PPR, and surgical plan myopia were 0.95, 0.92 and 0.96, respectively. Also, the correlation coefficient between “exact” astigmatism, subjective, PPR and astigmatism in plan were 0.89, 0.83 and 0.90 respectively. As indicated, the strongest correlation was observed between excat myopia and astigmatism, and PRP myopia and astigmatism.

Conclusion: The mean myopia measured by Zywave aberrometer was comparable with exact myopia. Planning the myopic refractive correction based on the patient’s subjective refraction and adjusted by age was the most accurate method to achieve the least amount of residual refraction. There was no significant difference between exact astigmatism and preoperative astigmatism measured by the three methods.

Keywords: Surface Ablation, Aberrometer, Subjective Refraction
Full-Text [PDF 188 kb]   (1582 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Ophthalmology
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:


XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Karimian F, Shahabi C, Asadollahi M, Tabatabaie M, Aghazadeh Amiri M, Eslami S. Comparison of Subjective Refraction, Predicted Phoropter Refraction (PPR) by Zywave Aberrometer, and Final Surgical Plan Used for Laser Vision Correction. 3. 2014; 19 (4) :299-304
URL: http://binajournal.org/article-1-101-en.html

Volume 19, Issue 4 (7-2014) Back to browse issues page
مجله چشم‌پزشکی بینا Bina Journal of Ophthalmology
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 30 queries by YEKTAWEB 4256